The Harris Poll® #27, April 21, 2004
In Spite of Media Coverage, Widespread Belief in Weapons of
Mass Destruction and Iraqi Links to Al Qaeda Remain Virtually Unchanged
ROCHESTER, N.Y. – April 21, 2004 – A new Harris Poll finds that
public perceptions of the facts that led up to the invasion of Iraq remain
almost unchanged in spite of a barrage of media reports that might have changed
them.
For example:
- A 51% to 38% majority continues to believe that "Iraq actually had
weapons of mass destruction," virtually unchanged since February.
- A 49% to 36% plurality of all adults continues to believe that "clear
evidence that Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda has been found." These
numbers have scarcely changed since June 2003.
- A 51% to 43% plurality continues to believe that "intelligence given
before the war to President Bush by the CIA and others about Iraqi's weapons
of mass destruction" was "completely" or "somewhat"
accurate. In February a 50% to 45% plurality believed this.
- While a 43% plurality believes that the "U.S. government deliberately
exaggerated the reports of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to increase
support for war," a 50% plurality (also virtually unchanged over the
last eight months) continues to believe that the government "tried to
present the information accurately."
These are the results of a nationwide Harris Poll of 979 adults surveyed by
telephone by Harris Interactive® between April 8 and 15, 2004.
Sense of being "bogged down" increases
Only one of the eight questions asked in this survey on Iraq found any
significant change over the last two months. Those who believe that it is
"very likely" that the U.S. will get "bogged down for a long time
in Iraq and not be able to create a stable government there" have increased
from 37% in February to 45% now. However this has had no significant impact on
the number of people who "favor keeping a large number of U.S. troops there
until there is a stable government " (42%) or those who favor
"bringing most of our troops home in the next year" (51%).
A case of cognitive dissonance?
The remarkable stability of these numbers suggest that people have made up
their minds on many of the key issues relating to weapons of mass destruction
and links to Al Qaeda, and that it would take something very big to change them.
It seems that people believe media reports which fit with their opinions and
reject those which do not. The balance on several of the key questions is tilted
roughly 50% to 40% in favor of the administration.
The potential impact of these issues in the November elections
If President Bush continues to enjoy this modest but significant advantage
between now and November, it will be difficult for Senator Kerry and the
Democrats to use these issues against him in the election campaign. If, on the
other hand, a substantial majority of the public comes to believe that there
were no weapons of mass destruction, or links to Al Qaeda, or that President
Bush exaggerated the evidence to increase support for the invasion, the result
could be disastrous for him.
TABLE 1
FAVOR KEEPING LARGE NUMBER OF U.S. TROOPS IN IRAQ OR BRINGING
MOST HOME IN NEXT YEAR
"Do you favor keeping a large number of U.S. troops in
Iraq until there is a stable government there OR bringing most of our
troops home in the next year?"
Base: All Adults
|
2003 |
2004 |
|
Oct. |
Feb. |
April |
|
% |
% |
% |
Favor keeping a large number of U.S. troops in Iraq until there is a
stable government there |
46 |
45 |
42 |
Favor bringing most of our troops home in the next year |
47 |
51 |
51 |
Not sure/Refused |
7 |
4 |
8 |
NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly due to rounding.
TABLE 2
HOW LIKELY U.S. WILL GET BOGGED DOWN FOR A LONG TIME
"How likely do you think it is that the U.S. will get
bogged down for a long time in Iraq and not be able to create a stable
government there? Would you say that is . . .?"
Base: All Adults
|
2003 |
2004 |
|
October |
December |
February |
April |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
Very likely |
42 |
39 |
37 |
45 |
Somewhat likely |
32 |
30 |
36 |
29 |
Not very likely |
14 |
22 |
16 |
13 |
Not at all likely |
7 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
Not sure/Refused |
5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly due to rounding.
TABLE 3
WERE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S STATEMENTS ABOUT IRAQ, TERRORISTS AND
WEAPONS ACCURATE OR INACCURATE?
"Do you believe that what we were told by the government
before the Iraq war about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and Iraq’s
links to Al Qaeda, the terrorist organization, was generally accurate or
misleading?"
Base: All Adults
|
2003 |
2004 |
|
June |
August |
October |
December |
February |
April |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Generally accurate |
55 |
47 |
44 |
45 |
40 |
40 |
Misleading |
36 |
45 |
50 |
47 |
53 |
51 |
Not sure/Refused |
10 |
8 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
9 |
NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly due to rounding.
TABLE 4
BELIEVE CLEAR EVIDENCE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION FOUND IN
IRAQ OR NOT?
"Do you believe that clear evidence of weapons of mass
destruction has been found in Iraq, or not?
Base: All Adults
|
2003 |
2004 |
|
June |
August |
October |
February |
April |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Clear evidence found |
35 |
27 |
30 |
18 |
19 |
No clear evidence found |
55 |
63 |
63 |
75 |
74 |
Not sure/Refused |
10 |
10 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly due to rounding.
TABLE 5
BELIEVE IRAQ HAD WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION WHEN WAR BEGAN?
"Do you believe Iraq actually had weapons of mass
destruction when the war began or not?"
Base: All Adults
|
2003 |
2004 |
|
June |
August |
October |
February |
April |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Believe Iraq had them |
69 |
67 |
60 |
51 |
51 |
Do not believe |
21 |
23 |
29 |
40 |
38 |
Not sure/Refused |
10 |
10 |
11 |
9 |
11 |
NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly due to rounding.
TABLE 6
BELIEVE CLEAR EVIDENCE OF IRAQI SUPPORT OF AL QAEDA HAS BEEN
FOUND OR NOT?
"Do you believe clear evidence that Iraq was supporting
Al Qaeda has been found in Iraq or not?"
Base: All Adults
|
2003 |
2004 |
|
June |
August |
October |
February |
April |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Clear evidence found |
48 |
50 |
49 |
47 |
49 |
No clear evidence |
33 |
35 |
38 |
38 |
36 |
Not sure/Refused |
19 |
14 |
12 |
15 |
15 |
NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly due to rounding.
TABLE 7
BELIEVE CIA INTELLIGENCE GIVEN BEFORE WAR ACCURATE/MISLEADING?
"Do you believe that intelligence given before the war to
President Bush by the CIA and others about Iraqi's weapons of mass destruction
was completely accurate, somewhat accurate, somewhat misleading, or very
misleading?"
Base: All Adults
|
February
Total |
April
Total |
|
% |
% |
Completely accurate |
6 |
5 |
Somewhat accurate |
44 |
46 |
Somewhat misleading |
29 |
28 |
Very misleading |
16 |
15 |
Not sure |
5 |
5 |
Refused |
1 |
* |
NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly due to rounding.
TABLE 8
BELIEVE U.S. GOVERNMENT DELIBERATELY EXAGGERATED/ACCURATELY
PRESENTED REPORTS OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?
"Do you believe that the U.S. government deliberately
exaggerated the reports of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in order to
increase support for war, or do you think it tried to present the information
accurately?"
Base: All Adults
|
2003 |
2004 |
|
June |
August |
October |
December |
February |
April |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Tried to present accurately |
56 |
53 |
49 |
50 |
51 |
50 |
Deliberately exaggerated |
37 |
40 |
41 |
45 |
43 |
43 |
Not sure/Refused |
8 |
7 |
9 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly due to rounding.
Methodology
The Harris Poll® was conducted by telephone within the United
States between April 8 and 15, 2004 among a nationwide cross section of 979
adults (ages 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race, education, number of
adults, number of voice/telephone lines in the household, region and size of
place were weighted where necessary to align them with their actual proportions
in the population.
In theory, with a probability sample of this size, one can say with 95
percent certainty that the results have a statistical precision of ±3
percentage points of what they would be if the entire adult population had been
polled with complete accuracy. Unfortunately, there are several other possible
sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than
theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include refusals to be
interviewed (non-response), question wording and question order, interviewer
bias, weighting by demographic control data and screening (e.g., for likely
voters). It is impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these
factors.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National
Council on Public Polls.
____________________________________________
J21026
Q445, Q447, Q450, Q455, Q460, Q465, Q466, Q470 |